The American Revolution
It is interesting that Strayer
notes that “what was revolutionary about the American experience was…the kind
of society that had already emerged within the colonies” (787). By attempting
to tighten imperial control, Britain further “infuriated many of the colonies”
(786). I found it interesting that while the status of traditional gentlemen
was diminished due to “a widening political participation,” women and people of
color did not benefit from these changes.
The French Revolution
It is interesting how in each
revolution, the issue of women’s rights and equality and the means in which
women fought for their rights differs regarding their progress. In the French
Revolution, female political participation was present as they took part in the
events of the revolution. By signing petitions and forming women’s clubs women
were able to voice their political stance and the inequality of power that was
distributed to men over women. This movement was met with an all-male
legislative body that banned all women’s clubs and led to the label of viragos,
meaning domineering woman, which in society was not considered a woman. Despite
this response, Strayer states that a lead historian notes that “the French
Revolution more than any other event…opened up the question of women’s rights
for consideration” (790).
Abolition of Slavery
It is interesting that while the
majority of African slaves were sent to Brazil and the Caribbean, for the
southern states of the United States “it was the only society in which the end
of slavery occurred through such a bitter…and highly destructive civil war”
(800). I find this disturbing in that while other regions that had far more
slaves did not have such a resistance to abolition the way that the United
States did. What does this say about the conditions in the United States at
that time in comparison to Brazil and the Caribbean?
It is also interesting that
Strayer reveals that “the economic lives of the former slaves did not improve
dramatically” (800). I found this observation to be interesting but also not
surprising, as how would a former slave continue to make a living when that
previous occupation has been all that he/she has done up to that point.
Nations and Nationalism
Strayer describes nationalism as
“an infinitely flexible and enormously powerful idea” (802) This idea of nationalism
would be engrained with the political ideology and cultural identity of the
people, with Strayer noting this process of “becoming American” (802) This section
made me question what it means to “be an American,” beyond being a legal
citizen of the United States of America. What elements of national identity are
uniquely American and what does it mean to be an American in terms of ideology
and lifestyle?
The United States and
Industrialism
I found it interesting that
unlike in Europe, Strayer points out “there was no major political party…to
represent the interests of the working class” (849). An interesting observation
Strayer makes is that while socialism and Marxism served to represent the interests
of the working class in Europe, both of these did little to improve working
conditions in America.
The reason for this difference
was due to a number of factors:
1. The American Federation of Labor was conservative and did not
include “radical unskilled laborers” and it “refused to align with any party.”
This limited the Union’s political influence.
2. The diversity of the laborers contrasted with the more
homogenous working forces in Europe, which in turn “undermined the class
solidarity of American workers” (849).
3. With land being cheaper and home ownership available, there
was a higher standard of living for the average American worker.
Colonial Development: Economic
Progress or Exploitation?
Strayer identifies three
developments as a result of colonialism:
1. It further “integrated the Asian and African economies into a
global network exchange” (901) from where it currently resided.
2. Europeans brought many of their modern processes to “improve”
the colonial societies, such as transportation/communication infrastructure
such as railroads, telegraphs, postal service.
3. There was no major breakthrough in modern industrial society;
Strayer describes that “after two centuries of colonial rule” India became
independent yet still remained “one of the poorest of the world’s developing
countries (902).
I found it
interesting that the “acquisition of Western education” and the desire to
embrace European culture was considered “an almost magical power” as it could
allow for the possibility of upward social mobility and higher status. Yet,
Strayer notes that “Europeans generally declined to treat their Asian and
African subjects-even those with a Western education-as equal partners” (904).
This goes back to the opening of Chapter 18, and an account of an Englishman
who refused to speak to the natives in English due to the “danger of organizing
against the government and Europeans”(879). So despite the second development
of bringing modern processes to the colonized people, as well as their
education and religion, there was a distinct fear of backlash and uprising
which led to a “colonial insistence on maintaining a distance and distinction
between”(879) the colonizer and the colonized.
Strayer, W. (2013). Atlantic Revolutions - Global Echoes, Revolutions and Industrialization, Colonial Encounters in Asia and Africa, 784-787, 790, 798-805, 847-850, 880-884.
No comments:
Post a Comment